![]() ![]() ![]() It is probably this which causes Cache-Control: no-cache and similar headers to be sent for all, even static, resources to the browser. Now I tried with Zulu 8 and Openwebstart 1.1.1. With Oracle webstart and Oracle or Zulu 8 it starts up in a second. And btw I have another algorithm class for random pivots so don't suggest that since this is specifically for fixed pivots. I think that this is caused by (Java) system property being ON, which in turn activates the property. We are using a Java 8 Webstart application based on Spring and Swing since a long time. The new Brave browser blocks ads and trackers that slow you down and. (according to a test class, this algorithm is not fast enough)? What is causing it to be slow that you guys can see here? I have made some changes myself but nothing that fixed it. Originally launched in April 2004 as a Java-only application, it is now available. So this got me wondering why the recursive calls keep on calling even after the if statement (condition) is fulfilled? Or did I misunderstand that, in that case what is causing it to give me an error after perfectly printing the sorted array?Īll in all how do I make this algorithm faster In some cases while printing the array it stops and gives the same errors. When I make it print the sorted array of size 100k or laregr it does print the array and then a couple of seconds later I get an Error which refers to a couple of lines that casued it. I think I am getting a stack overflow errorīecause of the recursive calls. The problem is it is very slow (according to a teacher), and a problem I'm facing is that this algorithm doesn't work for data size larger than 100000. Once in a great while there will be a site that OW chokes on, and I will fire up Mozilla, but that is rare.quote:The rumor of Apple creating a browser is vaguely scary, simply because they'll inevitably saddle it with some crap interface, while neglecting things like speed, stability, and CPU usage.As you can see, this quicksort algorithm looks fine and it does work. A normal JVM will simply convert each bytecode instruction it receives on an individual basis, and is thus a rather slow process. I trashed IE as soon as OSX was done installing it. Anyway, OmniWeb works fine for most of the sites that I visit, and its privacy, localization, and filtering features are top notch. Yeah, I know that external programs can take care of all of that, but it sucks anyway. Java can be slower than other languages in specific circumstances, but isn’t slow in general. Because, you know, everybody loves popups, popunders, and spyware. I don't want my web browser crashing my whole system just because it might be a tad faster.quote:Originally posted by Morte:Yes, IE6 for Windows just rules. Quote:Originally posted by Hannibal:I currently consider web browsing to be the low point of the OS X experience, and if Apple could put out a top-notch browser that not only works as well as IE under Windows but is also as deeply integrated into the OS, I'd be very happy.I wouldn't. It wouldn't be Apple if they didn't throw in some useless eyecandy (so they'd abandon the perfectly good tabbed interface in favor of a drawer full of real-time minimized window representations, and if that doesn't take up enough processor power to make you wish you had a 970 yesterday, then heap on gloss until it does). This is a case though where they'd inherit the hard work and just have to wrap it in a pretty interface. Could you please suggest any free or paid api which can solve my problem. but for older version of file there is no streaming api available. Better they invest the effort in improving Quartz.It certainly doesn't do much to advance the idea that Cocoa apps are faster than their Carbon counterparts. So to avoid memory overflow issue, I want to append data without loading complete file in memory. XUL might be able to be drawn as fast as the relatively slow native Aqua GUI, but right now it's not even close.quote:Based on recent iApps I can't see how Apple can improve the browsing speed - they're more likely to make it even more glacial. ![]() Chimera was like this at first too.The main difference is Chimera uses native controls while Phoenix is still using XUL to draw. What I'd like to see is Phoenix for OS X, since they seem to be moving faster than Chimera and have the extensibility as well.They can move fast at the beginning because most of the groundwork is already done. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |